No.43539
Please dont
No.43540
What's a web pee
No.43541
>>43539pic related
>>43540its like a smaller png!
No.43544
>>43543its small like a jpg but high detail like a png! best of both worlds!
No.43574
Did webp ever end up having any major value over the other formats? I know there are a lot of image formats out there, but the only two that ever get used are PNG and JPG. I think there were some serious successors to jpeg back in the day, but nothing ever ended up replacing it. Has it already been outclassed by another patent free format?
I feel like this is the same situation as some of the lossless data compressors like deflate/zip and by extension, MP3, which just never died despite the argument for a replacement.
No.43593
>>43574and GIF!
I feel like WebP just showed up too late. If it had been developed in the 90's or even 2000's it might've gotten more traction, since more people were on dial-up or had very limited mobile data plans. But now most people have fast internet and plenty of mobile data relative to the sizes of typical images.
I thought tar and 7z caught on pretty well for zip replacements, at least in the open source software world.
No.43597
>>43593The problem with 7z is that it's still Windows only. Igor wasn't open to joining the open source software community. I think he's the only contributor to the project. He never bothered to add any type of support for POSIX/Linux systems and p7zip is dead in the water.
No.43607
>>43594but i cant send the
cutes i find on google images that are webp, i have to copy and resave them which is a hassle
No.43735
As google phone user, I have 100's of webp I can't post anywhere, image boards have become estrained to me