[ home ] [ jp / archive ] [ snow / tan ]

/jp/ - Mysterious Thoughtography Collection

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
YouTube
Password (For file deletion.)
- Please read the Rules and the FAQ.
- Supported file types: JPG, PNG, GIF, SVG, WebM, MP3, OGG, MID/MIDI
- Maximum file size: 20MB

[Return][Go to bottom]

File: 1612655401926.jpg (87.77 KB, 960x540, 52vyqqmpluf61.webp.jpg) [ IQDB | SauceNAO ]

 No.43538

add webp support nenmin!

 No.43539

Please dont

 No.43540

What's a web pee

 No.43541

File: 1612661504407.png (127.02 KB, 592x368, __uehara_himari_and_udagaw….png) [ IQDB | SauceNAO ]

>>43539
pic related

>>43540
its like a smaller png!

 No.43542

File: 1612662299395.png (46.5 KB, 312x206, thinkin.png) [ IQDB | SauceNAO ]

webp? What happened to webn and webo?

 No.43543

File: 1612663154018.png (217.25 KB, 496x496, Toho Satono 002.png) [ IQDB | SauceNAO ]

Why would a small PNG be a good thing? A JPG is a small PNG and they are bad.

 No.43544

>>43543
its small like a jpg but high detail like a png! best of both worlds!

 No.43545

File: 1612669328925.jpg (307.22 KB, 2508x3541, KF Caracal 001.jpg) [ IQDB | SauceNAO ]

>>43544
I don't believe that's possible. There must be a trade off.

 No.43546

File: 1612669789343.png (120.01 KB, 492x591, 1355365334246.png) [ IQDB | SauceNAO ]

>>43545
the tradeoff is it was made in like 2010 which means theres no support for it in legacy software!

 No.43574

Did webp ever end up having any major value over the other formats? I know there are a lot of image formats out there, but the only two that ever get used are PNG and JPG. I think there were some serious successors to jpeg back in the day, but nothing ever ended up replacing it. Has it already been outclassed by another patent free format?

I feel like this is the same situation as some of the lossless data compressors like deflate/zip and by extension, MP3, which just never died despite the argument for a replacement.

 No.43593

>>43574
and GIF!

I feel like WebP just showed up too late. If it had been developed in the 90's or even 2000's it might've gotten more traction, since more people were on dial-up or had very limited mobile data plans. But now most people have fast internet and plenty of mobile data relative to the sizes of typical images.

I thought tar and 7z caught on pretty well for zip replacements, at least in the open source software world.

 No.43594

File: 1612855480962.jpg (423.78 KB, 1600x1800, 1612761516287.jpg) [ IQDB | SauceNAO ]

webp is a mess and it's only useful on petabyte scale storage. Most programs also not handle it well. Adding it to a small site like nen would only increase unneccessary complexity and frustration on user end.
Telegram also handles it badly since it has its stickers in webp, so sending a cute in webp to a friend is a troublesome effort.
It is also made by google, and, well, google products are very 'volatile' usually.
A webp could be a moving picture like a gif, a lossless still image like a png, a lossy image like jpeg or a lossless animated png. No wonder most sites and programmers use it, it even sounds like a mess to deal with

 No.43597

>>43593
The problem with 7z is that it's still Windows only. Igor wasn't open to joining the open source software community. I think he's the only contributor to the project. He never bothered to add any type of support for POSIX/Linux systems and p7zip is dead in the water.

 No.43607

>>43594
but i cant send the cutes i find on google images that are webp, i have to copy and resave them which is a hassle

 No.43644

File: 1613089616896.jpg (272.61 KB, 960x540, v9wjwe6e6vg61.webp.jpg) [ IQDB | SauceNAO ]


 No.43735

As google phone user, I have 100's of webp I can't post anywhere, image boards have become estrained to me



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Go to top]
[ home ] [ jp / archive ] [ snow / tan ]